Last evening James and I went down to Indianapolis to the Landmark and saw both The Reader with Kate Winslet and Doubt with Meryl Streep and I can’t rate each of the films high enough.
In the case of The Reader, Kate Winslet brings to life the co-protagonist of Bernhard Schlink’s 1995 German novel, Der Vorleser, Hanna Schmitz who first meets newcomer David Kross’s Michael Berg, a young student she discovers ill on a street near her apartment on his way home from school. Kate Winslet is fantastic throughout as the emotionally reserved, yet caring, Hanna who engages in a passionate, yet short lived, affair with Michael. One must quickly get past the fact that Winslet and Kross are entirely nude, perpetually, for the first half of the film. Certainly, it’s attention grabbing and Winslet is, as always, beautiful, despite clear efforts to make her appear plainer. Kross, as the adorablely cute blonde haired, blue eyed German boy, holds his own.
Yet, despite all of that artifice, it was the performances themselves which keep you wrapt to the screen, Winslet’s Hanna, harbors a great many secrets which have left her both emotionally distant, and more heartbreaking, emotionally starved. Winslet, despite being considered a “supporting” character, carrys the film in her glances, her grimices, and her, very few, smiles. For both Kross and Winslet this film is as much about what they say as what you must read that they cannot say.
Kross, it is interesting to learn, was required to learn English to play Micheal for the film, a fact that one finds all the more fascinating as his English is, amazingly, good. Ralph Fiennes carries on where Kross’s youth makes him unbelieveable as Micheal, but for the brevity of Fiennes’s role, you wholly believe he is Micheal and his love for Hanna burns as strongly as the day her met her.
Something must be said as well for the makeup department, making Kate Winslet age throughout the film; despite the seven hours a day it required to age Winslet, it, clearly, was worth every moment. Interestingly, 11 years ago James Cameron thought it unfit to age Winslet to 101, yet here, years later, I can only wonder what difference it would have made with Winslet as “Old Rose”… I can only imagine she would have pulled it off brilliantly.
Titanic was 11 years ago. I was 11 years old when I first saw it, and, in all honestly, I have adored Kate Winslet ever since so, to see her character is such pain, to see her age over the course of a two hour film, I found, grappled with her fantastic performance, almost beyond personal endurance. I couldn’t help but feel Hanna’s loneliness and isolation; I walked out of the film covered in tears in a complete daze. Never have I been so touched by a film.
Dear God if she doesn’t get that Oscar, there is fundamentally something wrong with the world!